- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 16:04:08 +0200
- To: <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Hi, It seems that this message was sent only to the list an not github... I think at the level of a definition we can give ourselves a bit of slack, and only refine later (i.e. in our guidance document) what are the possible "names" or identifiers and what level of mandatoriness we expect. By the way I think what you outline in the second paragraph does not conflict with what is in https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/profiles/ (either as rather clean text or very drafty notes). Best, Antoine On 03/07/2019 19:21, Karen Coyle wrote: > What is meant by "named"? Is a name the same as an identifier? The same > as a title on a document? > > Note that we have stated that for content negotiation the resource MUST > have a web-based identifier (URI/IRI). When a profile is a document > (e.g. PDF) then I would say that it SHOULD have an identifier, but if it > doesn't it does not cease to be a profile. > > kc > > On 7/2/19 2:29 PM, aisaac via GitHub wrote: >> @tombaker I'm keen on "named" because this paves the way for URIs. And >> it's a requirement we've identified, I believe. >
Received on Tuesday, 9 July 2019 14:04:36 UTC