W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > September 2018

Re: [dxwg] Sub-editing/Issue 301

From: Simon Cox via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:18:02 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-419281275-1536279476-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
On this issue: 

> The document still repeats some properties in (e.g. title is in dcat:Catalog etc as well as dcat:Resource. In general the definitions are now the same. Are we happy to define the properties once in the super class and make that change now?

Since the association of many (most?) properties with classes is not axiomatized, but rather is just through normative text in the rec document, I wonder if we should copy down the list of inherited properties, instead of just saying 'In addition to the properties inherited from the super-class ...' - the links could still point back to the original documentation on the super-class, but it might be clearer to implementers what is expected. 

GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/332#issuecomment-419281275 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 7 September 2018 00:18:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:24 UTC