Re: [dxwg] Sub-editing/Issue 301

On this issue: 

> The document still repeats some properties in (e.g. title is in dcat:Catalog etc as well as dcat:Resource. In general the definitions are now the same. Are we happy to define the properties once in the super class and make that change now?

Since the association of many (most?) properties with classes is not axiomatized, but rather is just through normative text in the rec document, I wonder if we should copy down the list of inherited properties, instead of just saying 'In addition to the properties inherited from the super-class ...' - the links could still point back to the original documentation on the super-class, but it might be clearer to implementers what is expected. 

GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 7 September 2018 00:18:08 UTC