W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > September 2018

Re: [dxwg] Sub-editing/Issue 301

From: David Browning via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2018 11:14:12 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-419408029-1536318851-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Good point on the range: sections on property descriptions - that's still outstanding (that is, I've fixed the English text in the rdf, but not addressed the ranges.)

On repetition: yes, that might work.  I'm against having inherited property definitions duplicated in their entirety, but listing them in the section as part of/immediately below the Class definition would be helpful.  [Since I've been flipping between the 2014 spec and our work, the usefulness of having all the recommended properties for a class listed together stands out a bit....]

GitHub Notification of comment by davebrowning
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/332#issuecomment-419408029 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 7 September 2018 11:14:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:24 UTC