Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution

I guess thie biggest impact of adopting ADMS for cataloguing profiles is the axiomitisation that a profile is a sort of Dataset, hence we would not need to create a superclass of dcat:Distribution, but merely to align with  prof:ImplResourceDesc rdfs:subClassOf  dcat:Distribution,  

This doesnt negate the argument for a "Representation" superclass for clarity, but its a separate issue (i.e it shows profileDesc can complement ADMS and provide an interoperable way of describing key aspects of profiles within an ADMS conformant environment.)

(PS - we can easily tweak ProfileDesc to mode closely and formally align with defined ADMS roles - but prov:wasDerivedFrom is not expressive enough in itself to describe constraint conformance  mandated by the relationship, so we need some vocabulary somewhere to do this for us.

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2018 05:58:30 UTC