RE: Profiles ont namespace and profile docs short names - please respond

They could indeed be separate. I guess we are testing out options here. I thought that, since Dave R seems to think that self-contained management would be best then /ns/prof/ with /ns/prof/roles/ within it might be easiest. Functionally no difference for me I suppose and I do tend to prefer flatter namespaces.

-----Original Message-----
From: andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu> 
Sent: Thursday, 8 November 2018 7:23 PM
To: Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au>
Cc: kcoyle@kcoyle.net; public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: Profiles ont namespace and profile docs short names - please respond

Nick, about prof roles, cannot they have their own namespace? E.g.:

http://www.w3.org/ns/prof-role/

Do we really need to have them under prof? Maintaining them in a separate namespace would be easier.

Andrea


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) [mailto:Nicholas.Car@csiro.au]
>Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 7:35 AM
>To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net; public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
>Subject: RE: Profiles ont namespace and profile docs short names - 
>please respond
>
>There is no requirement for a namespace for the Guide or Conneg doc, 
>only document short codes, so no need for /dx/prof/xxx. The only 
>namespace requirements we have so far are for the ontology (proposal: 
>/dx/prof/) and sub-units of it such as the roles vocab (proposal: 
>/dx/prof/role/)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
>Sent: Thursday, 8 November 2018 1:19 AM
>To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
>Subject: Re: Profiles ont namespace and profile docs short names - 
>please respond
>
>Alejandra has a good point here. While "/dx/prof/" is nicely compact, 
>we actually have 3 "prof" deliverables. Alejandra suggests "prof-ont". 
>I suppose we could also consider
>
>/dx/prof/ont( or even ontology)
>/dx/prof/guide
>/dx/prof/conneg
>
>The nice thing about this is that it sets a pattern for other 
>profile-related work, which Nick also mentions below.
>
>kc
>
>On 11/7/18 6:22 AM, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On 07/11/2018 13:55, Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> NAMESPACE
>>>
>>> The namespace proposed for the Profiles Ontology by Dave Raggett as 
>>> likely easy for the W3C to manage is:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.w3.org/ns/dx/prof/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The /dx/ indicates this WG. Please note this is a slash URI, as 
>>> opposed to a hash URI, to allow for sub-namespaces, should they be
>needed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I recommend we adopt this namespace.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PROFILE DOCS
>>>
>>> The short codes informally in use for the profile documents are:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> prof-guide - Profile Guidance
>>>
>>> conneg-by-ap - Content Negotiation by Profile
>>>
>>> prof-ont - Profiles Ontology
>>>
>> So, what is the proposal 'prof' (as in the namespace above) or 
>> 'prof-ont' as here?
>>
>>
>>> prof-ietf - IETF draft (used in references only, not in doc names)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I recommend changing the conneg-by-ap to prof-conneg for "prof-"
>>> consistency, and the rest staying as they are.
>>>
>>
>> +1 to changing conneg-by-ap to prof-conneg
>>
>> I guess you will also change the folder in github to reflect this, 
>> once these names are decided.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Alejandra
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please could WG members with any suggestions for these proposals 
>>> weigh in via replies to this email before next week's plenary meeting?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Nick
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Nicholas Car*
>>>
>>> /Senior Experimental Scientist/
>>>
>>> CSIRO Land & Water
>>> 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia
>>>
>>> *E*nicholas.car@csiro.au <mailto:nicholas.car@csiro.au> *M* 0477 560
>>> 177 *P* 07 3833 5632
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>--
>Karen Coyle
>kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
>m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
>skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
>

Received on Thursday, 8 November 2018 22:14:44 UTC