- From: Nicholas Car via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 22:23:37 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Yes, the SSN ont has such an extension. The Reference to the SOSA document wasn't to suggest that Roles might be a module within PROF - just a vocab - but the reference was just to show another W3C document referring to non-normative individuals in examples. > it would be legitimate that the roles to be used with it appear in the core It would indeed be legitimate but is it preferable? I think not, given the static nature (after completion) of the ontology but the dynamic nature of an extensible roles list. > If you had a (non-normative) set of classes Indeed. You would see that a `Resource Descriptor` should indicate a `Resource Role`, and that's normative, but then the specific `Resource Role` individual chose for an instance could be one of any in a non-normative vocabulary. I don't anticipate "a (non-normative) set of classes and properties specifically dedicated to describe roles with more details" really, just a listing of individual Roles (with SKOS properties such as prefLabel etc.) but it's just a vocab, not an ontology module. -- GitHub Notification of comment by nicholascar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/536#issuecomment-437177941 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2018 22:23:43 UTC