- From: <andrea.perego@ec.europa.eu>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 15:19:51 +0000
- To: <Nicholas.Car@csiro.au>
- CC: <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>, <dsr@w3.org>, <alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk>
- Message-ID: <EDFF15E839F79242AA55B1468C63DDA90FD53772@S-DC-ESTG02-J.net1.cec.eu.int>
Thanks, Nick. Unfortunately, I didn't eventually manage to join the call yesterday. So, my apologies in advance if my questions have already been answered. My comments inline. > NAMESPACE > The namespace proposed for the Profiles Ontology by Dave Raggett as likely easy for the W3C to manage is: > > https://www.w3.org/ns/dx/prof/ > > The /dx/ indicates this WG. Please note this is a slash URI, as opposed to a hash URI, to allow for sub-namespaces, should they be needed. > > I recommend we adopt this namespace. It is unclear to me whether we cannot simply go for https://www.w3.org/ns/prof/ as done for other W3C vocabularies e.g.: http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat# http://www.w3.org/ns/dqv# http://www.w3.org/ns/duv# http://www.w3.org/ns/prov# Basically, I'm missing what should go under https://www.w3.org/ns/dx/ Also, which is the W3C policy for URI namespaces wrt http / https ? > PROFILE DOCS > The short codes informally in use for the profile documents are: > > prof-guide Profile Guidance > conneg-by-ap Content Negotiation by Profile > prof-ont Profiles Ontology > prof-ietf IETF draft (used in references only, not in doc names) > > I recommend changing the conneg-by-ap to prof-conneg for prof- consistency, and the rest staying as they are. +1 also from me to changing conneg-by-ap to prof-conneg. About the IETF one, and consistently with the above, I wonder whether it should be made explicit that it is about profile *content negotiation*: prof-conneg-ietf Cheers, Andrea ---- Andrea Perego, Ph.D. Scientific / Technical Project Officer European Commission DG JRC Directorate B - Growth and Innovation Unit B6 - Digital Economy Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 21027 Ispra VA, Italy https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/ ---- The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official position of the European Commission. From: Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran [mailto:alejandra.gonzalezbeltran@oerc.ox.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 3:22 PM To: Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park); public-dxwg-wg@w3.org; dsr@w3.org Subject: Re: Profiles ont namespace and profile docs short names - please respond Hi, On 07/11/2018 13:55, Car, Nicholas (L&W, Dutton Park) wrote: Hi all, NAMESPACE The namespace proposed for the Profiles Ontology by Dave Raggett as likely easy for the W3C to manage is: https://www.w3.org/ns/dx/prof/ The /dx/ indicates this WG. Please note this is a slash URI, as opposed to a hash URI, to allow for sub-namespaces, should they be needed. I recommend we adopt this namespace. PROFILE DOCS The short codes informally in use for the profile documents are: prof-guide Profile Guidance conneg-by-ap Content Negotiation by Profile prof-ont Profiles Ontology So, what is the proposal 'prof' (as in the namespace above) or 'prof-ont' as here? prof-ietf IETF draft (used in references only, not in doc names) I recommend changing the conneg-by-ap to prof-conneg for prof- consistency, and the rest staying as they are. +1 to changing conneg-by-ap to prof-conneg I guess you will also change the folder in github to reflect this, once these names are decided. Thanks, Alejandra Please could WG members with any suggestions for these proposals weigh in via replies to this email before next weeks plenary meeting? Thanks, Nick Nicholas Car Senior Experimental Scientist CSIRO Land & Water 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia E nicholas.car@csiro.au<mailto:nicholas.car@csiro.au> M 0477 560 177 P 07 3833 5632
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2018 15:20:17 UTC