- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 07:20:01 -0800
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Dave, thank you for this, and we should consider the same for all of our deliverables. kc On 11/7/18 1:33 AM, David Browning via GitHub wrote: > davebrowning has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg: > > == Add support for errata in Req track documents (e.g. DCAT) == > Its likely that our deliverables will have errors that only come to > light after ratification. There are a number of ways this has been > addressed used by other groups. The easiest seems to be a link to a > simple page where potential errata can be recorded and/or processed > (subject to W3C procedure, of course). This is the approach used for > 2014 DCAT recommendation > [here](https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/DCAT_Errata), and something > similar is ised for [Data on the Web Best > Practices](https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/). > > At a minimum, the suggestion is to provide the link in the Rec > document, and a holding page as needed. > > (The discussion at #169 is probably relevent for background.) > > Please view or discuss this issue at > https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/545 using your GitHub account > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2018 15:20:38 UTC