Re: [dxwg] Add support for errata in Req track documents (e.g. DCAT)

Dave, thank you for this, and we should consider the same for all of our
deliverables.

kc

On 11/7/18 1:33 AM, David Browning via GitHub wrote:
> davebrowning has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/dxwg:
> 
> == Add support for errata in Req track documents (e.g. DCAT) ==
> Its likely that our deliverables will have errors that only come to
> light after ratification.  There are a number of ways this has been
> addressed used by other groups.  The easiest seems to be a link to a
> simple page where potential errata can be recorded and/or processed
> (subject to W3C procedure, of course).  This is the approach used for
> 2014 DCAT recommendation
> [here](https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/DCAT_Errata), and something
> similar is ised for [Data on the Web Best
> Practices](https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/).
> 
> At a minimum,  the suggestion is to provide the link in the Rec
> document, and a holding page as needed.
> 
> (The discussion at #169 is probably relevent for background.)
> 
> Please view or discuss this issue at
> https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/545 using your GitHub account
> 
> 

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2018 15:20:38 UTC