W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > June 2018

Re: [dxwg] Profile Composition and Languages

From: Rob Atkinson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:17:16 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-399282131-1529626635-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@azaroth42 "I think this issue is clear that the Profile and schema/validation language are separate resources, and thus profiles can only "link to" those machine processable constraint descriptions. That a profile could then link to many such descriptions, for different formats (JSON-schema, SHACL/ShEx, xml schema / schematron, etc.), thereby resolving Lars' definition that the profile is technology independent."

@larsgsvensson " I think we do: even if we can't develop a technology-independent language for defining (implementing) profiles, we can develop one for composing profiles.

OK, then let's do it!" 

this is exactly the  motivation for the ProfileDesc vocabulary :-)  Please identify where it succeeds or fails to meet these goals and also make sure the Use Cases and Requirements adequately drive this if there is any doubt. 

GitHub Notification of comment by rob-metalinkage
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/162#issuecomment-399282131 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 22 June 2018 00:17:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:04 UTC