W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > June 2018

Re: [dxwg] Profile negotiation [RPFN]

From: kcoyle via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 14:57:32 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-396968147-1528901851-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Actually, FRBR is based on documents and doesn't really fit well with data - the whole "work/expression" thing is very text-based, and even librarians complain that they can't fit it will into music, film, etc. Rather than reference FRBR, why not simply say that there is an abstraction of the dataset which has certain metadata functionality (e.g. describes the dataset apart from any specific instances of it), and there are one or more distributions which have byte-presence.

GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/74#issuecomment-396968147 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2018 14:57:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:04 UTC