W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > June 2018

Re: Plenary agenda June 5

From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:06:33 -0700
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <c4d895ab-1de8-f8b2-e30c-db21b30fbfb4@lbl.gov>
Are these supposed to be requirements as in

   "these are the things the spec we are writing needs to accomplish"

or requirements as in

   "these are the things a profile needs to have to be a profile"?

To me, the requirements listed on the agenda read as the latter, which 
are the contents of a spec (e.g., they use terms like "can" and "may"), 
but other requirements in the GDoc read as the former, which are 
requirements for a spec.


On 6/1/18 6:54 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.06.05
> Jaroslav organized the requirements into categories, and the first few
> categories are in the agenda for our discussion. PLEASE take a look at
> them and be ready to vote. We will try to vote on entire categories
> unless there are objections to specific requirements. If you will not be
> at the meeting but wish to comment or vote, you may do so in email and
> we will do our best to include your views.

Annette Greiner
NERSC Data and Analytics Services
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Friday, 1 June 2018 19:07:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:04 UTC