- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:06:33 -0700
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Are these supposed to be requirements as in "these are the things the spec we are writing needs to accomplish" or requirements as in "these are the things a profile needs to have to be a profile"? To me, the requirements listed on the agenda read as the latter, which are the contents of a spec (e.g., they use terms like "can" and "may"), but other requirements in the GDoc read as the former, which are requirements for a spec. -Annette On 6/1/18 6:54 AM, Karen Coyle wrote: > https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2018.06.05 > > Jaroslav organized the requirements into categories, and the first few > categories are in the agenda for our discussion. PLEASE take a look at > them and be ready to vote. We will try to vote on entire categories > unless there are objections to specific requirements. If you will not be > at the meeting but wish to comment or vote, you may do so in email and > we will do our best to include your views. -- Annette Greiner NERSC Data and Analytics Services Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Friday, 1 June 2018 19:07:00 UTC