1. Yes. The class names are in italics in the diagram which is the UML convention for 'Abstract' And there is a usage note on `dcat:Resource` which says > It is strongly recommended to use a more specific sub-class when available. A similar recommendation would be made on `dcat:Representation`. 2. Absolutely. In a different thread somewhere I already made this point too ... though FRBR has more layers (though arguably by sticking to just four it might not be expressive enough for some cases). However, I don't think FRBR is that widely known outside of library circles, and even there is somewhat controversial (@kcoyle wrote a book on how is has hindered more than helped!) -- GitHub Notification of comment by dr-shorthair Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/317#issuecomment-417561181 using your GitHub accountReceived on Friday, 31 August 2018 06:04:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:24 UTC