Re: [dxwg] Change domain or create superclass of dcat:Distribution

I do get a FRBR-ish vibe from this, something like Resource being FRBR:Expression, but that would require the subC's of Resource to have a link to Representation (hasRepresentation) rather than a direct dcat:Distribution. That's one of the down sides of FRBR as a data structure, its linearity.

Will there be any properties associated with dcat:Representation? It does seem that many of the properties of dcat:Resource would be appropriate. That could imply that there is a need for a class of "everything" with properties appropriate to both. But that would disrupt the current dcat:Resource.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kcoyle
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/317#issuecomment-417720178 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 31 August 2018 16:35:15 UTC