Re: [dxwg] Use of dct:type with both Class and Concept

@jakubklimek You wrote "_If there is a set of different APs, each with a different set of restrictions and specifics, those will not be interoperable. What is the point then?_".
People will *always* implement a standard in their own way, maybe because of their (mis)understanding or maybe because their situation is a little different. Documenting their assumptions and decisions in a profile makes it easier for people with a different set of assumptions and decisions to understand how to interoperate with them, maybe using mapping or conversion tools.
There should be a sweet spot: keeping the standard flexible where possible and strict where necessary.

GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 30 August 2018 07:13:08 UTC