Re: [dxwg] Use of dct:type with both Class and Concept

@jakubklimek It is true that existing profiles may have to be revised as a result of the revision of DCAT, but I was hoping to keep that to the absolutely necessary minimum. We always run the risk that implementers do not feel it is useful to convert data they already have. I agree that if they've done it 'wrong', the new DCAT should not endorse the practice -- e.g in this case of dct:type -- but there is no guarantee that people will have the resources to make the change.

GitHub Notification of comment by makxdekkers
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 30 August 2018 06:58:09 UTC