W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > April 2018

Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile)

From: Lars G. Svensson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 14:12:11 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-382400661-1524060729-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
@nicholascar [wrote](https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/195#issuecomment-381402078):
> In the examples given so far, we have cases of a Profile that has both an "actionable as code" implementation and a "merely document" implementation, see how the existing DCAT-AP profiling of DCAT is documented with both SHACL and document implementations!

Yes, I now start to grasp that. My view so far had been that there is a profile URI that (per content negotiation) resolves to human-readable and machine-understandable profile descriptions/definitions. From there (i. e. the profile URI) there are links to other documentation and to machine-processable versions of the profile (e. g. XML Schema, ShEx etc.).

Those two approaches are obviously something we need to discuss as a group so I'm happy to see that there is plenty of time scheduled at the Genoa meeting.

GitHub Notification of comment by larsgsvensson
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/195#issuecomment-382400661 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2018 14:12:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:42:02 UTC