W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > April 2018

Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile)

From: aisaac via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:10:21 +0000
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-382028521-1523977820-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
"Schema" sounds really bad/dangerous to me, to the point that I would prefer "Implementation Resource Descriptor". The existence of RDF Schema alone is going to make any story around a 'profile schema' extremely hard to tell.

Couldn't we simply use something like "profile implementation" for the time being?
(btw using "resource" and "descriptor" is probably going to be tough in the context called the "Resource Description" Framework. Like, everything around us is resources and descriptions ;-)

GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/195#issuecomment-382028521 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2018 15:10:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:22 UTC