Re: [dxwg] Definition of "Schema" (as opposed to profile)

"Schema" sounds really bad/dangerous to me, to the point that I would prefer "Implementation Resource Descriptor". The existence of RDF Schema alone is going to make any story around a 'profile schema' extremely hard to tell.

Couldn't we simply use something like "profile implementation" for the time being?
(btw using "resource" and "descriptor" is probably going to be tough in the context called the "Resource Description" Framework. Like, everything around us is resources and descriptions ;-)

GitHub Notification of comment by aisaac
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2018 15:10:24 UTC