Re: Editorial changes to requirements TOC / Ask for comments

+1


On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 at 04:34 Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote:

> Jaro - I think this looks good. All requirements are in a group undering
> a heading. We could probably discuss the placement of some of the
> requirements (I didn't look at it closely for that aspect) but the
> important thing is that it is now fairly easy to scan the list of
> requirements.
>
> Thanks for doing this.
> kc
>
> On 11/29/17 5:32 AM, Jaroslav Pullmann wrote:
> >
> >  Dear colleagues,
> >
> >   please have a look at the updated requirements TOC here:
> >
> >
> > https://rawgit.com/jpullmann/dxwg/gh-pages/ucr/index.html#Requirements
> >
> >   compared to:
> >
> >     https://rawgit.com/w3c/dxwg/gh-pages/ucr/index.html#Requirements
> >
> >   I re-arranged few of the requirements to make the groups more
> consistent.
> >  Further I shortened some labels in a nominal style and added persistent
> > IDs
> >  for requirements (at moment only visually) to make them independent of
> > ordering.
> >
> >   Let me know whether this is acceptable, I'd then apply the changes to
> > DXWG UCR document.
> >  I'll try to process any feedback received till the handover on Monday,
> > 4th.
> >
> >   Many thanks
> >  Jaro
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
> skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 <+1%20510-984-3600>
>
>