My regrets as well; and I’d like to record my +1 for release of the FPWD of the UCR doc.
By the way, I did a pull request for fixing three missing references ReSpec was complaining about. https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/41
Linda
Op 28 nov. 2017 om 03:47 heeft "Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>" <Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>> het volgende geschreven:
My apologies for this week's meeting.
I have *2* clashing telecons (i.e. a total of 3!).
I vote +1 to release the UCR document.
Simon
-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Coyle [mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net]
Sent: Sunday, 26 November, 2017 04:17
To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Meeting November 28
The agenda is:
https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2017.11.28
The main task is to agree on the first public working draft of the UCR document. Please look over the draft before the meeting. Remember, this is a FIRST DRAFT and any changes that are needed can be done in future versions. The purpose of this draft is to give W3C members and any other interested parties an idea of our progress and the direction we are taking.
Thanks,
kc & team
--
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net<mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal)
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600