RE: dxwg-ACTION-59: Write up a general case for requirements 6.27 and 6.28

This action was about the creation of a general use case for these two requirements (now 6.8.4 [1] & 6.8.5 [2]), concerning the use of "qualified forms" for specifying relationships between a dataset and related resources.

The reference UC (5.19 [3]) is however already generic, so I wonder whether there's a specific aspect that needs to be addressed here. 

Thanks!

Andrea

----
[1] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#RID19.1 
[2] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#RID19.2 
[3] https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/#ID19 

----
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
Scientific / Technical Project Officer
European Commission DG JRC
Directorate B - Growth and Innovation
Unit B6 - Digital Economy
Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/


----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Dataset Exchange Working Group Issue Tracker
>[mailto:sysbot+tracker@w3.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 10:43 PM
>To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
>Subject: dxwg-ACTION-59: Write up a general case for requirements 6.27 and
>6.28
>
>dxwg-ACTION-59: Write up a general case for requirements 6.27 and 6.28
>
>https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/track/actions/59

>
>Assigned to: Andrea Perego

Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 12:32:37 UTC