- From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 21:19:46 +0000
- To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net, "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CACfF9Lw=7EY1vOrrq=vqwdmzBvGu0PuzpPdKO7Ko2LLkM+dWYA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Perhaps the "negotiation by profiles" team (and I am happy to put my hand up for this) can identify which requirements affect negotiation - this is probably quite minimal - maybe just a definition of profile, some descriptions and use of HTTP identifiers, The other filter is which requirements require a capability (new class or property, or new definition) in core DCAT vs for example, use of an externally defined property with existing DCAT classes. I guess as guidance is being developed the case for a DCAT change may emerge. Prioritising the metadata needed for profile definition and negotiation is necessary - but perhaps everyone could just go and distribute say 3 votes initially , we process the highest voted ones, then repeat that process ? Rob On Fri, 1 Sep 2017 at 01:48 Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > All, > > We have a very important task on our agenda now, which is to determine > the requirements for the three deliverables. This is also quite a > complex task. Although this is directly a task for the UCR group, it > needs the attention of the entire working group. > > Ideally, at this point we would be able to gather together in room with > Post-It(tm) notes (and a lot of coffee) and we could organize the > requirements around concepts and deliverables as a group activity. As > our next face-to-face is much too far away, we need to find a way to do > this work virtually. > > Some possible organizing principles are: > > - which requirements are for which deliverables? (Yes, some requirements > may be valid for more than one deliverable.) > - what are the logical categories that requirements fall into within > each deliverable? > - what is the priority for each requirement? (e.g. absolutely required; > required if possible; nice to have but not required) > > Following are some examples from previous working groups that the team > is aware of. If you know of others please reply with them. > > - https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#challenges (DWBP challenges) > - https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/#requirements (DWBP requirements) > - https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-ucr/#requirements (SHACL requirements) > > Please give some time to this and share an ideas with the group. > > kc for the team > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) > skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 <+1%20510-984-3600> > >
Received on Thursday, 31 August 2017 21:20:34 UTC