- From: Rob Atkinson <rob@metalinkage.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 21:14:55 +0000
- To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net, public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACfF9LxB7h-_FVpC25Ke_T9hud0MDQEd57ZASLoT9ygvUttTxw@mail.gmail.com>
UC have broken links - we will get thge requirements consolidated. There are indeed some links from Reqs to UC missing. There were many "proto-requirements" that have been merged into similar ones - so the text will often not be there in the exact same form - the idea is the resulting requirement is expressed in its most general form with examples drawn from the specific UC. This is a lot of editorial work to simplify what otherwise would be a bit of a repetitive mess. These interpretations need careful checking by the group - the UCR editors are trying to bring it in to a manageable task to both confirm these requirements, and ultimately for a reader to consume them. That said, a list of places where you think the essence may have been lost, and a specific link _to_ the UC from the Requirement is missing would indeed be helpful. Rob On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 at 23:43 Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > Hi, Rob. There seem to be requirements that were there before but no > longer are, for example the requirements on use case 41. I also see > other use cases where there are no requirements. Do you want a list, or > can you find them from this? > > kc > > On 8/14/17 5:15 AM, Rob Atkinson wrote: > > Github seems to be pushing the updates: > > > > https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/ > > > > now has a better consolidated and cross-referenced set of requirements, > > along with other edits. Requirements are referenced back to the source > > use cases in most cases, but use cases arent yet forward referenced to > > requirements. > > > > I'd say we are at about 70% of editorial work to have a first draft of > > requirements deduplicated as much as possible without further > > discussion, and cross referenced and formatted neatly. > > > > We will need to review these requirements of course to make sure nothing > > has been missed, and requirements are in fact adequately justified by > > the use cases. Feel free to review these and create PRs to > > forward-reference your UC to the requirements, send me a list or wait > > for the UCR editors to get around to this. > > > > Rob Atkinson > > > > > > > > > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > m: 1-510-435-8234 (Signal) > skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 <+1%20510-984-3600> > >
Received on Monday, 14 August 2017 21:15:44 UTC