RE: Action-208 Contact oa wg to see whether they would consider adding dqv motivation

Antoine,

Do I understand correctly that you propose to replace the class
dqv:QualityAssessment by ao:Annotation, but still keep the property
dqv:hasQualityAnnotation?

In fact, I wondered why there was a separate class dqv:QualityAssessment as
it did not seem to be different from ao:Annotation at all.

I just wrote a proposal to use dqv:hasQualityAnnotation for one of my
projects, so as long as that is not at risk, it's fine with me.

Makx.

-----Original Message-----
From: Antoine Isaac [mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl] 
Sent: 01 June 2016 15:49
To: Public DWBP WG <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Action-208 Contact oa wg to see whether they would consider
adding dqv motivation

Hi everyone,

Keeping you informed on the discussion with the WA group on this issue.
Especially one of the chair's last mails:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2016May/0285.html

It seems that we'll have to keep our own dqv:qualityAssessment Motivation,
but we could count on them to add a more generic 'assessment' motivation
that we can link to as a 'broader' motivation, following the extension
pattern recommended by Web Annotation WG for motivations [3].

One interesting piece of feedback from Rob is that we should consider
actually dropping our subclass of oa:Annotation. I.e. removing
dqv:QualityAnnotation altogether.
I think I'm in favour of this - if we're recommended to have a
quality-specific motivation anyway, then having the dqv:QualityAnnotation is
a bit redundant. As expressed in the formal equivalence axiom at [4].

Has anyone any strong opinion against doing this?

Cheers,

Antoine

[3]
https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-annotation-vocab-20160331/#extending-motivatio
ns
[4] https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dqv/#dqv:QualityAnnotation

On 27/05/16 09:00, Antoine Isaac wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Just to keep track of this action [1]: I've sent a mail to the WA group
[2] after discussing the matter with Rob Sanderson last week.
>
> antoine
>
> [1] https://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/actions/208
> [2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-annotation/2016May/0275.html
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2016 15:20:54 UTC