Re: dwbp-ISSUE-166: Should the data vocabularies section be removed? [Best practices document(s)]

Hi all,

In May we started a discussion about the Data Vocabularies section [1] and
we couldn't reach a consensus [2]. It is really important that we come back
to this discussion and reach consensus before the next DWBP draft's
publication.

I still think that the creation of vocabularies is out of the scope of the
document. However, BP16(Document vocabularies), BP17(Share vocabularies in
an open way) and BP18(Vocabulary versioning) are more related to the
publication of vocabularies than to the creation. In this case, maybe we
could keep these BP and change a little bit the introduction of the section
to say that BP are related just to the usage and publication of
vocabularies. Then, in this case BP20(Choose the right formalization level)
should be removed.

I also want to discuss the relationship between BP15(Use standardized
terms) and BP19(Re-use vocabularies). I am not sure if we should talk about
the use of standardized terms or the re-use of vocabularies or both. If we
won't discuss the creation of vocabularies then maybe BP-19 should also be
removed.

Looking forward to your comments!

Thanks!
Bernadette

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-dwbp-20150625/#dataVocabularies
[2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015May/0038.html

2015-05-21 11:15 GMT-03:00 Data on the Web Best Practices Working Group
Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>:

> dwbp-ISSUE-166: Should the data vocabularies section be removed? [Best
> practices document(s)]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2013/dwbp/track/issues/166
>
> Raised by: Bernadette Farias Loscio
> On product: Best practices document(s)
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-dwbp-wg/2015May/0038.html
>
>
>
>


-- 
Bernadette Farias Lóscio
Centro de Informática
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
----------------------------------------------------------------------------