- From: Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:35:19 -0300
- To: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Cc: "public-dwbp-wg@w3.org" <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANx1PzxHXn6V9tjQCPL8YU+ffrzhNwh=pmip97OKScZ-RfQcJA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Annette and Makx, Thanks again for your answers and comments! My comments are inline. *Q1: What is the real audience for the DWBP document?* > > > > *Q2: What will be the target audience for the BP? Data publishers or Data > Publishers and Data Consumers?* > > > > Data publishers. I am with Annette that these two audiences MUST be the > same. > I am still not convinced that the DWBP document is not interesting for re-users (already using the terminology presented by Makx) even if the scope is just BP for data publishers. If re-users will manipulate the data, don't you think that it will be good if they have some knowledge about the best practices used to create and publish the data? > > *Q3: Should we talk about data consumers in general or just about > developers?* > > > > One question that I ask myself is: what do we mean by developer? Do we > think about a technical developer, of apps or more generally of software, > or does the term include business people who are involved in designing and > developing products or services? > > > > To me, we are talking about a person or an organisation that consumes the > data that is made available to re-use it for some business goal or social > objective. In other environments, the term “re-user” is often used, to > distinguish the end-user who just looks at the data from the intermediary > who takes data from the publisher and delivers it in some value-added form > to the end user. > > > > Both the technical and the ‘business’ re-user will benefit from best > practice in data publication. For example, the technical developer benefits > from re-usable formats, while the business developer benefits from clear > licensing arrangements . > > > > So I would say that we consider developers in both categories, technical > and business, and we don’t consider end users. Otherwise we would also need > to talk about good user interface design, WCAG etc. However, as I said > before, I don’t think we should try to write best practice for re-users – > they will benefit from the good practice applied by data publishers. > + 1 I like the idea of having a different terminology to denote different types of data consumers, i.e., end users and re-users. I also like the definition for developers"To me, we are talking about a person or an organisation that consumes the data that is made available to re-use it for some business goal or social objective." *Q4: What is the role of a data consumer? * > > > > A data consumer is either a re-user or an end user. > > +1 Cheers, Bernadette > > > Makx. > > > > > > > > *From:* Bernadette Farias Lóscio [mailto:bfl@cin.ufpe.br] > *Sent:* Thursday, December 18, 2014 11:21 PM > *To:* public-dwbp-wg@w3.org > *Subject:* Call for comments on open questions about the audience for the > DWBP doc > > > > Hi all, > > > > This week we had a great discussion about the audience for the DWBP > document. However, we still have some open questions: > > > > 1. The Audience > > > > We don't have a consensus about the audience, i.e., if both data > publishers and data consumers are the audience of the document or just data > publishers. > > > > Maybe, we can't reach consensus because there are two types of audience: > > > > i. The audience for the document itself. > > > > ii. The target "audience" for the BP, i.e., the ones who will execute the > BP. > > > > These two types of audience may be different, i.e., the audience of the > document may consist of both data publishers and data consumers, but the > target audience for the BP is composed by data publishers. Even if we're > gonna have just BP for data publishers, the document may be relevant for > people interested on using the data. > > > > *Q1: What is the real audience for the DWBP document?* > > > > > > 2. The target audience for BP > > > > It is not clear if the document should have BP for data publishers and BP > for data consumers. Until now, the focus of the document is on BP for data > publishers. However, it is important to note that we already have some > requirements concerning data usage [2]. > > > > We need to decide if we're gonna have these two types of BP (BP for data > publishers and BP for data consumers) in the DWBP document or the BP for > data consumers will be in another document. > > > > *Q2: What will be the target audience for the BP? Data publishers or Data > Publishers and Data Consumers?* > > > > 3. Data consumer x Developer > > > > The charter uses the term developer instead of data consumer, for example, > the mission of DWBP working group is "to develop the open data ecosystem, > facilitating better communication between developers and publishers;" [1]. > > It is important to decide if we're gonna consider just developers or if > we're gonna use the term data consumer to denote a broader class of people > interested on using data on the Web. Note that, in this case, data consumer > denotes the ones interested on manipulating the data and not the ones > interested on reading the data. > > > > *Q3: Should we talk about data consumers in general or just about > developers?* > > > > 4. The role of the data consumer > > > > We also had some discussions about the role of the data consumer. It is > not clear if the data consumer is the one who manipulates data on the Web > to produce data/information to end users or if the data consumer is the end > user. > > > > *Q4: What is the role of a data consumer? * > > > > It would be great to have your feedback about these questions. It is > important to reach a consensus about them in order to move on the right > direction on the writing of the DWBP document. > > > > Thanks again for all comments and suggestions! > > Bernadette > > > > > > > > > -- > > Bernadette Farias Lóscio > Centro de Informática > Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Bernadette Farias Lóscio Centro de Informática Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 19 December 2014 12:36:07 UTC