Re: followup to question about vocabularies and the glossary

Hoi Bernadette,

Sounds perfect! :)
Will you do it or shall I take care ?

Christophe


On 12 December 2014 at 13:46, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
wrote:
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
> I propose to include the template of the BP at the beginning of Section 6.
> "The Best Practices"  together with a general explanation about the
> organization of this section, i.e., the organization of BP according to the
> lifecycle. What do you think?
>
> Thanks!
> Bernadette
>
> 2014-12-12 5:35 GMT-03:00 Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> About the need for something else I was just thinking that it could be
>> good to keep the BP template we currently have at the end of the document
>> and use it as a reading guideline for the reader.
>> We could move it to the definitions, or close to the introduction, and
>> update a bit the text in it so that the reader sees what each part of the
>> BP answers.
>>
>> +1 ?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Christophe
>>
>> ----
>> Researcher
>> +31(0)6 14576494
>> christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl
>> Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS/KNAW) - http://dans.knaw.nl/
>> e-Humanities Group (KNAW) - http://www.ehumanities.nl/
>> Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web! - http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 11 Dec, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>> --
>> Annette Greiner
>> NERSC Data and Analytics Services
>> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>> 510-495-2935
>>
>> On Dec 5, 2014, at 8:59 AM, Bernadette Farias Lóscio <bfl@cin.ufpe.br>
>> wrote:
>>
>> In my opinion, I think we just need some definitions to help the
>> understanding of the document, like definitions for dataset, resource,
>> vocabulary, ontology...or do we need something else ?
>>
>> cheers,
>> Bernadette
>>
>> 2014-12-05 13:47 GMT-03:00 Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) <
>> Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>:
>>
>>> Glossary is document dependent. Vocabularies OTOH should not be so.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dr. Lewis John McGibbney PhD, B.Sc., MAGU
>>> Engineering Applications Software Engineer Level 2
>>> Computer Science for Data Intensive Systems Group 398M
>>> Jet Propulsion Laboratory
>>> California Institute of Technology
>>> 4800 Oak Grove Drive
>>> Pasadena, California 91109-8099
>>> Mail Stop : 158-256C
>>> Tel:  (+1) (818)-393-7402
>>> Cell: (+1) (626)-487-3476
>>> Fax:  (+1) (818)-393-1190
>>> Email: lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Dare Mighty Things
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/5/14, 7:22 AM, "Annette Greiner" <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Hi folks,
>>> >During this morning¹s call, I asked whether developing a separate
>>> >glossary might be redundant with the task we already have to develop a
>>> >vocabulary. I was thinking that, since a vocabulary is a list of what is
>>> >meant by specific terms to be used in a certain context, if we were
>>> >writing a vocabulary that would define what we were also contemplating
>>> >putting into a glossary, the two would be redundant. Looking again at
>>> the
>>> >charter, I see that there are two vocabularies that we are expected to
>>> >develop, and they are both pretty specific. Since neither of them is a
>>> >general vocabulary for describing published datasets, I would suggest
>>> >that we stick with adding a glossary, unless people think that there is
>>> >something to be gained by making it a vocabulary. For my own purposes, I
>>> >think a glossary is fine.
>>> >-Annette
>>> >--
>>> >Annette Greiner
>>> >NERSC Data and Analytics Services
>>> >Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>>> >510-495-2935
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
>> Centro de Informática
>> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Bernadette Farias Lóscio
> Centro de Informática
> Universidade Federal de Pernambuco - UFPE, Brazil
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


-- 
Onderzoeker
+31(0)6 14576494
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl

*Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*

DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
NWO.


Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:

DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> |
www.dans.knaw.nl


*Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/

*e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
[image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>

Received on Friday, 12 December 2014 13:10:18 UTC