- From: Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 16:33:06 +0100
- To: "Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M)" <Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov>
- CC: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>, DWBP Public List <public-dwbp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABP9CAG64YhKa0HTLGM8xnOqNZRR+z8usbCx_SFNCLqw0keXug@mail.gmail.com>
+1 to have a glossary On 5 December 2014 at 16:26, Mcgibbney, Lewis J (398M) < Lewis.J.Mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > +1 > > Dr. Lewis John McGibbney PhD, B.Sc., MAGU > Engineering Applications Software Engineer Level 2 > Computer Science for Data Intensive Systems Group 398M > Jet Propulsion Laboratory > California Institute of Technology > 4800 Oak Grove Drive > Pasadena, California 91109-8099 > Mail Stop : 158-256C > Tel: (+1) (818)-393-7402 > Cell: (+1) (626)-487-3476 > Fax: (+1) (818)-393-1190 > Email: lewis.j.mcgibbney@jpl.nasa.gov > > > > Dare Mighty Things > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/5/14, 7:22 AM, "Annette Greiner" <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote: > > >Hi folks, > >During this morning¹s call, I asked whether developing a separate > >glossary might be redundant with the task we already have to develop a > >vocabulary. I was thinking that, since a vocabulary is a list of what is > >meant by specific terms to be used in a certain context, if we were > >writing a vocabulary that would define what we were also contemplating > >putting into a glossary, the two would be redundant. Looking again at the > >charter, I see that there are two vocabularies that we are expected to > >develop, and they are both pretty specific. Since neither of them is a > >general vocabulary for describing published datasets, I would suggest > >that we stick with adding a glossary, unless people think that there is > >something to be gained by making it a vocabulary. For my own purposes, I > >think a glossary is fine. > >-Annette > >-- > >Annette Greiner > >NERSC Data and Analytics Services > >Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory > >510-495-2935 > > > > > > > -- Onderzoeker +31(0)6 14576494 christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl *Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)* DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en NWO. Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres: DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB Den Haag | +31 70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl <info@dans.kn> | www.dans.knaw.nl *Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!* http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/ *e-Humanities Group (KNAW)* [image: eHumanities] <http://www.ehumanities.nl/>
Received on Friday, 5 December 2014 15:33:58 UTC