- From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 09:23:58 +0200
- To: OCG Info <info@openconsent.com>
- Cc: Data Privacy Vocabularies and Controls Community Group <public-dpvcg@w3.org>
Hi! > We were discussing the semantics that are used in the > application of a purpose specification - for example consent for > genomic medical research, would have a use one, only use at this time > etc. i.e. defining constraints for / scoping the purpose to which the given consent applies to? > that there are legal > semantics that they combined into a label that defines both the > vocabulary and the semantics. e.g. :OnlyValidDuringEverySecondWednesdayInSeptemberToDecemberPurpose or a description of the "semantics" in NL used as a value of rdfs:comment etc. ? br simon --- DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna www: http://www.steyskal.info/ twitter: @simonsteys Am 2020-07-09 04:16, schrieb OCG Info: > HI All, > > Harsh asked me on the call yesterday to submit a question I hd to the > list. We were discussing the semantics that are used in the > application of a purpose specification - for example consent for > genomic medical research, would have a use one, only use at this time > etc. > > Harsh and Georg also reported a meeting with GA4GH, and its clear that > beyond purpose specification and the vocabulary that there are legal > semantics that they combined into a label that defines both the > vocabulary and the semantics. > > Is there anyone working on legal semantics ? > > A key reason I am asking, is that this is a topic in the Trust over > IP Decentralised Semantics WG and we will be exploring the data legal > relationship between vocabulary, ontology and semantics for digital > ledger consent. > > Does anyone on this list have a reference to any existing work ? And > of course is this something that is in scope of discussion at DPV CG ? > > > > - Kind Regards. > > Mark
Received on Friday, 10 July 2020 07:24:16 UTC