Re: Legal semantics inquiry

Hi,


> On 10 Jul 2020, at 03:23, Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at> wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
>> We were discussing the semantics that are used in the
>> application of a purpose specification - for example consent for
>> genomic medical research, would have a use one, only use at this time
>> etc.
> 
> i.e. defining constraints for / scoping the purpose to which the given consent applies to?

Yes
> 
>> that there are legal
>> semantics that they combined into a label that defines both the
>> vocabulary and the semantics.
> 
> e.g. :OnlyValidDuringEverySecondWednesdayInSeptemberToDecemberPurpose or a description of the "semantics" in NL used as a value of rdfs:comment etc. ?

Yes

> 
> br simon
> 
> ---
> DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
> Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna
> 
> www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys
> 
> Am 2020-07-09 04:16, schrieb OCG Info:
>> HI All,
>> Harsh asked me on the call yesterday to submit a question I hd to the
>> list.  We were discussing the semantics that are used in the
>> application of a purpose specification - for example consent for
>> genomic medical research, would have a use one, only use at this time
>> etc.
>> Harsh and Georg also reported a meeting with GA4GH, and its clear that
>> beyond purpose specification and the vocabulary that there are legal
>> semantics that they combined into a label that defines both the
>> vocabulary and the semantics.
>> Is there anyone working on legal semantics ?
>>  A key reason I am asking, is that this is a topic in the Trust over
>> IP Decentralised Semantics WG and we will be exploring the data legal
>> relationship between vocabulary, ontology and semantics for digital
>> ledger consent.
>> Does anyone on this list have a reference to any existing work ?   And
>> of course is this something that is in scope of discussion at DPV CG ?
>> - Kind Regards.
>> Mark

Received on Friday, 10 July 2020 10:23:41 UTC