Re: Ontologies added to Github

Dear All,

In addition to what Harsh already mentioned, I also uploaded the ontology class hierarchy for personal data category to WebProtege [1].
The intention is to make it easier for those who would like to see and explore the ontology without having to install Protege themselves.

I created a shared account for viewing and commenting the ontology (i.e., for those without WebProtege account), please use it responsibly:
username: dpvcg
password: DMdYx2i9Yg6s

Thank you and best regards,
—
Fajar J. Ekaputra
194/1 Information & Software Engineering Group,
Technische Universität Wien (TUWien).
W: http://juang.id Skype: fajar.juang

[1] https://webprotege.stanford.edu/#projects/4658d8e1-588e-4847-90c1-6118eabac007/edit/Classes


On 11.02.2019, at 19:34, Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com<mailto:me@harshp.com>> wrote:

Hello everoyone,
# tldr; version
We (myself and Fajar) have put (OWL2) ontologies based on our discussions on Github under the DPVCG organisation umbrella.
https://github.com/dpvcg


# Github
* why github? It's the best choice for version control in terms of familiarity, usage, and features in terms of collaboration.
* There is a separate repository for each ontology to allow different people to work on each separately - and we can combine these together into a common repository at every milestone if need be.
* There are no new additions or changes in the ontologies as compared to the wiki.
* The org/project is currently 'owned' by me, and should be transfered to, say W3C, when that issue is resolved (currently assigned to @rigo)

Where the classes/concepts came from -
# personal data - added categories from Enterprivacy
# processing - added from GDPR
# legal basis - added from discussion in emails
# purposes - added from last discussion, with categories by Axel, Javier, Harsh
# security & storage - empty

Currently, the ontologies are sparse, and not documented - this is intentional, and once everyone agrees on going ahead, we can add the required documentation and metadata.

To contribute, please provide your github username, and I (or any other admin) will add you to the github project.

Discussion for the meeting call tomorrow:
1. Is everyone okay with using Github and the current structure?
2. Should we focus only on providing classes or are we also modelling properties and axioms?
3. Who is interested in working on the ontologies?

Regards,
--
---
Harshvardhan J. Pandit
PhD Researcher
ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin
https://harshp.com/