- From: Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 00:04:24 +0530
- To: public-dpvcg <public-dpvcg@w3.org>
- Cc: "Ekaputra, Fajar Juang" <fajar.ekaputra@tuwien.ac.at>, Javier D. Fernández <jfernand@wu.ac.at>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@wu.ac.at>
Hello everoyone, # tldr; version We (myself and Fajar) have put (OWL2) ontologies based on our discussions on Github under the DPVCG organisation umbrella. https://github.com/dpvcg # Github * why github? It's the best choice for version control in terms of familiarity, usage, and features in terms of collaboration. * There is a separate repository for each ontology to allow different people to work on each separately - and we can combine these together into a common repository at every milestone if need be. * There are no new additions or changes in the ontologies as compared to the wiki. * The org/project is currently 'owned' by me, and should be transfered to, say W3C, when that issue is resolved (currently assigned to @rigo) Where the classes/concepts came from - # personal data - added categories from Enterprivacy # processing - added from GDPR # legal basis - added from discussion in emails # purposes - added from last discussion, with categories by Axel, Javier, Harsh # security & storage - empty Currently, the ontologies are sparse, and not documented - this is intentional, and once everyone agrees on going ahead, we can add the required documentation and metadata. To contribute, please provide your github username, and I (or any other admin) will add you to the github project. Discussion for the meeting call tomorrow: 1. Is everyone okay with using Github and the current structure? 2. Should we focus only on providing classes or are we also modelling properties and axioms? 3. Who is interested in working on the ontologies? Regards, -- --- Harshvardhan J. Pandit PhD Researcher ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin https://harshp.com/
Received on Monday, 11 February 2019 18:34:52 UTC