- From: Harshvardhan J. Pandit <me@harshp.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 11:55:07 +0000
- To: public-dpvcg@w3.org
tldr; from Eva' last email regarding adding 'legitimate interest' to the vocabulary On 08/11/18 11:21 AM, Eva Schlehahn wrote: > I'd suggest just adding 'legitimate interest' as term to the taxonomy to > the collection of legal grounds. The controller company then has to take > its own additional organisational measures to document why they think > this is a valid legal ground for them. Thanks Eva for the clarification w.r.t using legitimate interest as a legal basis for compliance. The most interesting point of all was the use of legitimate interest without the data subject's expectation. From the discussion then, legitimate interest and consent are mutually exclusive, i.e. one cannot describe data as needed for legitimate interest AND also request consent over it. Moving from this point forward, would all legal basis also be mutually exclusive, or can they be used in combination with each other? That is, when providing a taxonomy of legal basis, would the application be "select one of these" or "select all applicable"? Regards, -- --- Harshvardhan J. Pandit PhD Researcher ADAPT Centre, Trinity College Dublin https://harshp.com/
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2018 11:55:33 UTC