- From: Gavin Treadgold <gt@kestrel.co.nz>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 22:39:20 +1200
- To: W3C Disaster Management Ontology List <public-disaster-management-ont@w3.org>
I too support the outcomes. How many individuals are currently signed up for this, and do we need to consider shoulder-tapping some others to join us? Cheers Gavin On 14/06/2007, at 22:17, Chamindra de Silva wrote: > I agree to the outcomes. > > Chamindra de Silva > http://chamindra.googlepages.com > > Renato Iannella wrote: >> Hi all - the W3C Incubator groups have a life-span of one year. >> This may sound like >> a long time, but in reality it goes very quickly in 'standards time'. >> The most important aspects are the outcomes. As these are used to >> inform and kick-start >> any new work as a (potential) fully fledged Working Group. >> I would like to see 2 main deliverables: >> 1 - A current state-of-the-art of vocabularies used in the crisis/ >> disaster/emergency/resilience sector. >> 2 - Towards an interoperability framework for the crisis/disaster/ >> emergency/resilience sector >> The first deliverable gives a good idea of what is happening >> today, which we can use in the second deliverable >> to setup the roadmap towards interoperability. The latter will >> also pose the questions and drivers for future work. >> As an example, the current W3C Multimedia Semantics Incubator >> Group [1] is working on: >> - Multimedia Semantics on the Web: Vocabularies [2] >> - Multimedia Annotation Interoperability Framework [3] >> I believe that we should set a realistic scope - driven by >> outcomes - for the XG >> for this effort to deliver benefits to our community. >> Cheers... Renato Iannella >> NICTA >> [1] <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/> >> [2] <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/wiki/Vocabularies> >> [3] <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-interoperability/>
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2007 10:39:36 UTC