- From: Chamindra de Silva <chamindra@opensource.lk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 15:47:19 +0530
- To: Renato Iannella <renato@nicta.com.au>
- CC: W3C Disaster Management Ontology List <public-disaster-management-ont@w3.org>
I agree to the outcomes. Chamindra de Silva http://chamindra.googlepages.com Renato Iannella wrote: > > > Hi all - the W3C Incubator groups have a life-span of one year. This may > sound like > a long time, but in reality it goes very quickly in 'standards time'. > > The most important aspects are the outcomes. As these are used to inform > and kick-start > any new work as a (potential) fully fledged Working Group. > > I would like to see 2 main deliverables: > > 1 - A current state-of-the-art of vocabularies used in the > crisis/disaster/emergency/resilience sector. > 2 - Towards an interoperability framework for the > crisis/disaster/emergency/resilience sector > > The first deliverable gives a good idea of what is happening today, > which we can use in the second deliverable > to setup the roadmap towards interoperability. The latter will also pose > the questions and drivers for future work. > > As an example, the current W3C Multimedia Semantics Incubator Group [1] > is working on: > - Multimedia Semantics on the Web: Vocabularies [2] > - Multimedia Annotation Interoperability Framework [3] > > I believe that we should set a realistic scope - driven by outcomes - > for the XG > for this effort to deliver benefits to our community. > > > Cheers... Renato Iannella > NICTA > > > [1] <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/> > [2] <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/wiki/Vocabularies> > [3] <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-interoperability/> > >
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2007 10:17:40 UTC