W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-digipub-ig@w3.org > August 2016

Re: [Moderator Action] [dpub] 20160822 agenda

From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:50:49 +0000
To: "Cramer, Dave" <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com>, Boris Anthony <boris@rebus.foundation>
CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "DPUB mailing list (public-digipub-ig@w3.org)" <public-digipub-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <52D0234C-9FB5-42B4-A73F-71FDA854AC54@adobe.com>
If the annotations modify the “package”, and there are either technical or licensing reasons that prevent the modification of that “package” – yes.

Of course, that doesn’t mean that a given UA/RS couldn’t keep the annotations physically separate from the publication and “merge them on the fly”.


On 8/25/16, 4:25 PM, "Cramer, Dave" <Dave.Cramer@hbgusa.com> wrote:

    On 8/25/16, 3:56 PM, "Leonard Rosenthol" <lrosenth@adobe.com> wrote:
    >Because not all authors/publishers of PWPs will necessarily allow them to
    >be modified.
    Most of what Boris mentioned sounded to me more like annotations than
    modification of content. Are there use cases for preventing annotations of
    a PWP?
    This may contain confidential material. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender, delete immediately, and understand that no disclosure or reliance on the information herein is permitted. Hachette Book Group may monitor email to and from our network.

Received on Thursday, 25 August 2016 20:51:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:36:30 UTC