- From: James Salsman <jsalsman@talknicer.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:09:15 -0700
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: James Salsman <jsalsman@talknicer.com>, public-device-apis@w3.org
Received on Monday, 19 July 2010 22:09:44 UTC
Whether it's a good idea to ask permission for buffered device uploads seems to depend on whether we are reasonably able to disallow [onchanged=]form.submit() and similar un-buffering operations. I'm in favor of doing so. Is anyone opposed to that? On Jul 19, 2010 1:58 AM, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org> wrote: (dropping other ccs for now) Le samedi 17 juillet 2010 à 14:02 -0700, James Salsman a écrit : > Furthermore I hope the security considerations sections will soon > include a summary of the langu... Given the focus of the document being discussed, there is no such a thing as remembered permissions grants: the permission is a one-time permission, and only granted to pick a file from the system (as a traditional file picker would); the only difference is that beyond the traditional picking from the filesystem, you can also choose to get a file from one of the capture devices of the terminal. The reliance on shutter/record keys would be for the programmatic API, which is not the one being discussed on this thread. Dom
Received on Monday, 19 July 2010 22:09:44 UTC