W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > August 2010

RE: a note on time slots (Re: Calendaring coordination)

From: 이원석 <wslee@etri.re.kr>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 23:54:48 +0900
Message-ID: <B4EAD1122C31304099A5CDEA5447210F02138879@email2>
To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>
Cc: "W3C Device APIs and Policy WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "Cyrus Daboo" <cyrus@daboo.name>
Hi. Thomas.
I'd like to attend.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Wonsuk.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Roessler
> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 11:20 PM
> To: Thomas Roessler
> Cc: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG; Cyrus Daboo
> Subject: a note on time slots (Re: Calendaring coordination)
> 
> 
> Robin just pointed out that noon ET would be *extremely* inconvenient for
> folks from Korea (at least one of whom will be part of the conversation).
> 
> So let's decouple this:  If you're interested in the conversation, please
> speak up now.
> 
> Once we have a firm list of participants, we'll need to go through the
> scheduling exercise.
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 9 Aug 2010, at 22:14, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> 
> > On 28 Jul 2010, at 12:21, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> >
> >> I talked to some folks about calendaring in the hallways.  The IETF
> calsify WG isn't currently active; most of the work has moved to the
> CalConnect consortium:
> >> 	http://www.calconnect.org/
> >>
> >> Cyrus and I agreed to work toward a conversation between Calconnect and
> this WG about the lunisolar calendaring requirement.  I'll follow up on
> that when I'm back form the IETF meeting.
> >
> >
> > There's a proposal on the table to meet at noon Boston time on a Tuesday
> some time soon; I'm tentatively suggesting 24 August.
> >
> > My suggestion would be that the agenda be:
> >
> > 1. General presentation and possibly discussion of the calendaring API
> work (and requirements).  That item would require Richard and Suresh on
> the call, who'll know the API best.
> >
> > 2. Discussion of specific lunisolar requirement and design options.
> That would require the folks with an interest in lunisolar calendars.
> >
> > If you're interested in participating in this discussion, please contact
> me.
> >
> >
> 
Received on Wednesday, 11 August 2010 14:55:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:45 UTC