- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:19:59 +0200
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>, Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
Robin just pointed out that noon ET would be *extremely* inconvenient for folks from Korea (at least one of whom will be part of the conversation). So let's decouple this: If you're interested in the conversation, please speak up now. Once we have a firm list of participants, we'll need to go through the scheduling exercise. Regards, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> (@roessler) On 9 Aug 2010, at 22:14, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 28 Jul 2010, at 12:21, Thomas Roessler wrote: > >> I talked to some folks about calendaring in the hallways. The IETF calsify WG isn't currently active; most of the work has moved to the CalConnect consortium: >> http://www.calconnect.org/ >> >> Cyrus and I agreed to work toward a conversation between Calconnect and this WG about the lunisolar calendaring requirement. I'll follow up on that when I'm back form the IETF meeting. > > > There's a proposal on the table to meet at noon Boston time on a Tuesday some time soon; I'm tentatively suggesting 24 August. > > My suggestion would be that the agenda be: > > 1. General presentation and possibly discussion of the calendaring API work (and requirements). That item would require Richard and Suresh on the call, who'll know the API best. > > 2. Discussion of specific lunisolar requirement and design options. That would require the folks with an interest in lunisolar calendars. > > If you're interested in participating in this discussion, please contact me. > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 August 2010 14:20:05 UTC