W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > August 2010

RE: a note on time slots (Re: Calendaring coordination)

From: Suresh Chitturi <schitturi@rim.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 09:31:49 -0500
Message-ID: <D37CC1B151BD57489F4F89609F168FE8066BC338@XCH01DFW.rim.net>
To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>
Cc: "W3C Device APIs and Policy WG" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "Cyrus Daboo" <cyrus@daboo.name>
Please count me in.

Thanks,
Suresh

 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-device-apis-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Roessler
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 9:20 AM
To: Thomas Roessler
Cc: W3C Device APIs and Policy WG; Cyrus Daboo
Subject: a note on time slots (Re: Calendaring coordination)

Robin just pointed out that noon ET would be *extremely* inconvenient
for folks from Korea (at least one of whom will be part of the
conversation).

So let's decouple this:  If you're interested in the conversation,
please speak up now.

Once we have a firm list of participants, we'll need to go through the
scheduling exercise.

Regards,
--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)







On 9 Aug 2010, at 22:14, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> On 28 Jul 2010, at 12:21, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> 
>> I talked to some folks about calendaring in the hallways.  The IETF
calsify WG isn't currently active; most of the work has moved to the
CalConnect consortium:
>> 	http://www.calconnect.org/
>> 
>> Cyrus and I agreed to work toward a conversation between Calconnect
and this WG about the lunisolar calendaring requirement.  I'll follow up
on that when I'm back form the IETF meeting.
> 
> 
> There's a proposal on the table to meet at noon Boston time on a
Tuesday some time soon; I'm tentatively suggesting 24 August.
> 
> My suggestion would be that the agenda be:
> 
> 1. General presentation and possibly discussion of the calendaring API
work (and requirements).  That item would require Richard and Suresh on
the call, who'll know the API best.
> 
> 2. Discussion of specific lunisolar requirement and design options.
That would require the folks with an interest in lunisolar calendars.
> 
> If you're interested in participating in this discussion, please
contact me.
> 
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
Received on Wednesday, 11 August 2010 14:32:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:53:45 UTC