- From: Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:15:17 +0100
- To: "Tran, Dzung D" <dzung.d.tran@intel.com>
- CC: Device APIs and Policy Working Group WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On 21/12/2009 19:25, Tran, Dzung D wrote: > We did decide to move this to the Geolocation WG. I couldn't find a reference to a group decision, but perhaps http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/actions/32 will do, and we can indeed leave it to geolocation. Max. I separated out the > Compass spec to pass along to the Geolocation WG as: > > http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/system-info/compass.html > > Thanks Dzung Tran Intel Corp > > -----Original Message----- From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-device-apis-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Device APIs > and Policy Working Group Issue Tracker Sent: Monday, December 21, > 2009 04:40 AM To: public-device-apis@w3.org Subject: ISSUE-60 > (sysinfo-accelerometer): orientation, acceleration compass in System > Information [System Information and Events API] > > > ISSUE-60 (sysinfo-accelerometer): orientation, acceleration compass > in System Information [System Information and Events API] > > http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/track/issues/60 > > Raised by: Max Froumentin On product: System Information and Events > API > > From: http://www.w3.org/mid/4B2F69E6.4040804@opera.com > >> 15) Given that this is a pretty long list of sensors, maybe we >> should add orientation, acceleration, and compass. Theses are >> suppose to be done in the W3C Geolocation WG, but I do not see why >> they can't be added here... they are pretty small additions and do >> not have exactly the same privacy concerns. > > I was hoping geolocation to do the work for us, but fair enough ;) > I'd like a decision from the WG before starting, though. > > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 December 2009 15:15:55 UTC