public-device-apis@w3.org from April 2009 by author

Arthur Barstow

• Re: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Re: Starting the chartering discussion -- security policy for APIs (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Friday, 24 April)

JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA

• RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Thursday, 30 April)

Marcin Hanclik

• RE: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Thursday, 30 April)
• RE: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Thursday, 30 April)
• RE: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Thursday, 30 April)
• RE: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Thursday, 30 April)
• RE: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Wednesday, 29 April)
• ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Tuesday, 28 April)

Marcos Caceres

• Re: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Thursday, 30 April)
• Re: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Thursday, 30 April)

Nick Allott

• RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Monday, 27 April)

Robin Berjon

• Re: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Thursday, 30 April)

Thomas Roessler

• Re: ACCESS' input, was: RE: Proposal for new WG to specify "Concrete APIs" (Wednesday, 29 April)
• Re: Starting the chartering discussion -- security policy for APIs (Tuesday, 28 April)
• Starting the chartering discussion -- security policy for APIs (Tuesday, 14 April)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 April 2009 17:26:56 UTC