- From: Arthur Barstow <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:26:04 -0400
- To: ext JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
- Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, DANIEL JESUS COLOMA BAIGES <dcoloma@tid.es>
Jose, On Apr 30, 2009, at 12:34 PM, ext JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA wrote: > We believe that it is important to review as many contributions > for the baseline as possible, and hence we have gone through your > baseline suggestion and through BONDI API (see attached) to find > out which are the key similarities and differences. > > The comparison is available as well at: > > https://files.morfeo-project.org/mymobileweb/public/ > BondiDeviceStatus.xhtml Thanks; this is helpful! Regarding the following conclusion in your attachment: [[ We believe that the convergence of the two approaches in a future W3C standard is feasible, taking the best of both proposals, complementing the genericity advocated by Bondi with the versatility (synchronous, asynchronous, one shot) offered by Nokia's. ]] Indeed my expectation is the group will use inputs from all members of the group when creating the agreed specifications. > Last, but not least, this area is key for Telefónica, thus we will > be glad to have in W3C such as an active role as the one we are > having in BONDI, for instance being editors of the specification. This is good to hear Jose. -Regards, Art Barstow
Received on Thursday, 30 April 2009 17:26:56 UTC