public-device-apis-log@w3.org from February 2023 by thread

[sensors] Should we check for "same origin" or "same origin-domain"? (#457) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)

• Re: [sensors] Should we check for "same origin" or "same origin-domain"? (#457) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)

[compute-pressure] Does the privacy test need a same origin-domain or a same origin check? (#187) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)

• Re: [compute-pressure] Does the privacy test need a same origin-domain or a same origin check? (#187) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Does the privacy test need a same origin-domain or a same origin check? (#187) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Does the privacy test need a same origin-domain or a same origin check? (#187) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Does the privacy test need a same origin-domain or a same origin check? (#187) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Does the privacy test need a same origin-domain or a same origin check? (#187) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Does the privacy test need a same origin-domain or a same origin check? (#187) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Does the privacy test need a same origin-domain or a same origin check? (#187) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Does the privacy test need a same origin-domain or a same origin check? (#187) Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Does the privacy test need a same origin-domain or a same origin check? (#187) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Does the privacy test need a same origin-domain or a same origin check? (#187) Marcos Cáceres via GitHub (Wednesday, 22 February)

[compute-pressure] missing link in security and privacy section (#186) himorin / Atsushi Shimono via GitHub (Monday, 20 February)

[contact-picker] Copyright (#62) Tammy Walker via GitHub (Sunday, 19 February)

• Closed: [contact-picker] Copyright (#62) Christian Liebel via GitHub (Monday, 20 February)

Re: [ambient-light] Drop own powerful feature, require active local video source. (#83) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 8 February)

[compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Wei Wang via GitHub (Wednesday, 8 February)

• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Wei Wang via GitHub (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Wei Wang via GitHub (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Arnaud (Arno) Mandy via GitHub (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Wei Wang via GitHub (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Wei Wang via GitHub (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 16 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Focus control in privacy test steps (#185) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 16 February)

Re: [compute-pressure] Wide review tracker (#177) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)

[compute-pressure] Internationalization Checklist (#184) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)

• Re: [compute-pressure] Internationalization Checklist (#184) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Internationalization Checklist (#184) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Internationalization Checklist (#184) himorin / Atsushi Shimono via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Internationalization Checklist (#184) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)
• Re: [compute-pressure] Internationalization Checklist (#184) Addison Phillips via GitHub (Tuesday, 7 February)

Re: [contact-picker] Editorial: Add Contacts API history note (#58) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 6 February)

[compute-pressure] Accessibility Checklist (#183) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Friday, 3 February)

• Re: [compute-pressure] Accessibility Checklist (#183) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Friday, 3 February)

Re: [battery] Add Energy Saver Mode explainer (#55) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Friday, 3 February)

[system-wake-lock] Use case: playback of a list of audio tracks (#14) leonixyz via GitHub (Thursday, 2 February)

Closed: [compute-pressure] Add an implementation-defined change threshold exceeded check (#176) Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 2 February)

[compute-pressure] Contributing factors definition needs clarification (#181) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 2 February)

Re: [compute-pressure] Add an implementation-defined change threshold exceeded check (#180) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 1 February)

• Re: [compute-pressure] Add an implementation-defined change threshold exceeded check (#180) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 2 February)

Re: [compute-pressure] Add an implementation-defined change threshold exceeded check (#176) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 1 February)

Re: [compute-pressure] Add hysteresis to notify pressure observers algorithm (#176) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 1 February)

[device-posture] Avoid using the page visibility change steps hook (#103) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 1 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 22 February 2023 05:09:35 UTC