Re: [compute-pressure] Add an implementation-defined change threshold exceeded check (#180)

@kenchris thanks for the comments. I pushed an update, PTAL.

This was a bit hard to define in abstract without defining the concrete algorithm normatively, which I don't want to do. Thus I proposed that short two-step algorithm and an accompanying note that tries to explain what's the problem and what implementers should do to improve. I think the significance of the changes to contributing factors need to be considered collectively. That is, a significant change in one metric may not exceed the threshold for the entire system if other metrics remain within their own bounds.

Also, I wanted this to remain implementation-defined and thus I tried to avoid saying explicitly "if CPU utilization fluctuates around a boundary" to not steer implementers to think that is the metric to use.

Please take another look. Further suggestions welcome.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by anssiko
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/compute-pressure/pull/180#issuecomment-1412359265 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2023 16:35:28 UTC