Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub
- Re: [wake-lock] Fix Marcos' issues #186 and #185 (#197) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Add more type info (#196) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] More editorial fixes (#193) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) (Tuesday, 9 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Rename system to compute or similar (#177) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] Update spec metadata (#72) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Monday, 1 April)
- Closed: [deviceorientation] Add non-normative text describing the current deviceorientationabsolute implementation status (#60) (Monday, 1 April)
Chris Dumez via GitHub
Domenic Denicola via GitHub
Evan Bacon via GitHub
Fuqiao Xue via GitHub
Jake Archibald via GitHub
Keith Ito via GitHub
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub
- Re: [wake-lock] Allow to abort a request using an aborted signal (#183) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Closed: [wake-lock] WakeLockPermissionDescriptor should be it's own section (#186) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Closed: [wake-lock] obtain permission seems wrong (#187) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Fix Marcos' issues #186 and #185 (#197) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- [wake-lock] In obtain permission: don't co-opt resultPromise - it's creating a custom permission model (#198) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Need to add "wake-lock" to permissions registry (#184) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Lifetime of WakeLock (#195) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Lifetime of WakeLock (#195) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Add back AbortSignal and fix the counter (#183) (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Add back AbortSignal in addition to abort() and fix the counter (#183) (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Closed: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) (Tuesday, 16 April)
- Closed: [wake-lock] Rename system to compute or similar (#177) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Introduce rate limiting to prevent wake lock abuse (#124) (Monday, 8 April)
- [wake-lock] Rename system to compute or similar (#177) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] screen wake lock should be able to make use of proximy sensor (#175) (Thursday, 4 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] screen wake lock should be able to make use of proximy sensor (#175) (Thursday, 4 April)
- [wake-lock] screen wake lock should be able to make use of proximy sensor (#175) (Thursday, 4 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Need maximum screen brightness mode (#129) (Thursday, 4 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Need maximum screen brightness mode (#129) (Thursday, 4 April)
- Closed: [wake-lock] API to get list of active wake locks (#133) (Thursday, 4 April)
- Closed: [wake-lock] More diplay power modes (#84) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] More diplay power modes (#84) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] What do the wakelocks actually do? (#138) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Closed: [wake-lock] What do the wakelocks actually do? (#138) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Add "geolocation" wake lock (#170) (Monday, 1 April)
- [wake-lock] Abortion is a bit weird (#171) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] API to get list of active wake locks (#133) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Monday, 1 April)
- [wake-lock] Add "geolocation" wake lock (#170) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Add static requestPermission method on Window (#167) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Add static requestPermission method on Window (#167) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] What do the wakelocks actually do? (#138) (Monday, 1 April)
- Closed: [wake-lock] Give advice on how UAs should infer consent to take a wakelock (#140) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Give advice on how UAs should infer consent to take a wakelock (#140) (Monday, 1 April)
- Closed: [wake-lock] Requesting wake locks from Workers (#156) (Monday, 1 April)
Marcos Cáceres via GitHub
- Re: [wake-lock] Need to add "wake-lock" to permissions registry (#184) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Lifetime of WakeLock (#195) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- [wake-lock] Lifetime of WakeLock (#195) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] More editorial fixes (#193) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] More editorial fixes (#193) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] More editorial fixes (#193) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] More editorial fixes (#193) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Add back AbortSignal in addition to abort() and fix the counter (#183) (Monday, 29 April)
- [wake-lock] obtain permission seems wrong (#187) (Saturday, 20 April)
- [wake-lock] WakeLockPermissionDescriptor should be it's own section (#186) (Saturday, 20 April)
- [wake-lock] User real instances of things (#185) (Saturday, 20 April)
- [wake-lock] Need to add "wake-lock" to permissions registry (#184) (Saturday, 20 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Add back AbortSignal in addition to abort() and fix the counter (#183) (Thursday, 18 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: few more fixes (#182) (Thursday, 18 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: few more fixes (#182) (Thursday, 18 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Editorial: update to use more modern ReSpec stuff (#179) (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] chore(.travis.yml): enable ReSpec validation (#176) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Thursday, 4 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Wednesday, 3 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Tuesday, 2 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Create PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md (#168) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Add static requestPermission method on Window (#167) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Add static requestPermission method on Window (#167) (Monday, 1 April)
Raphael Kubo da Costa via GitHub
Reilly Grant via GitHub
- Re: [wake-lock] Allow to abort a request using an aborted signal (#183) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- [wake-lock] Losing reference to a WakeLock object is a bug or intended behavior (#199) (Tuesday, 30 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Add back AbortSignal and fix the counter (#183) (Monday, 29 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) (Wednesday, 17 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] requestPermission() and event handling clarification (#74) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Introduce rate limiting to prevent wake lock abuse (#124) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Rename system to compute or similar (#177) (Monday, 8 April)
- Re: [deviceorientation] Remove trailing comma from the PermissionState enum. (#73) (Friday, 5 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] screen wake lock should be able to make use of proximy sensor (#175) (Thursday, 4 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Canceling using AbortSignal is a bit weird (#171) (Monday, 1 April)
- Re: [wake-lock] Add "geolocation" wake lock (#170) (Monday, 1 April)
Thomas Steiner via GitHub
Tobie Langel via GitHub
Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2019 21:00:31 UTC