- From: Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 17:17:52 +0100
- To: kcoyle@kcoyle.net
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFF8A0C699.9734752C-ONC1257F76.0059798B-C1257F76.005987BF@netage.nl>
Hi Karen, Thanks for the follow up, does this mean that a constrained in SHACL should also be added ? Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards Bart van Leeuwen ############################################################## # twitter: @semanticfire # netage.nl # http://netage.nl # Esdoornstraat 3 # 3461ER Linschoten # tel. +31(0)6-53182997 ############################################################## From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org Date: 14-03-2016 15:44 Subject: Re: rdf language tag contraints Bart, thanks. I followed up on the history and it was indeed voted to become a requirement, but wasn't added. I will add it to the requirements list in the UC&R. kc On 3/13/16 9:46 AM, Bart van Leeuwen wrote: > Hi All, > > Seeing all the productive discussions and positive vibe on the list I > sat down and read the current Editors draft of SHACL [1] > > One of the things that strike me is that I cannot have a simple > constraint on a language tag. > > e.g. I need rdfs:label with '@en' for my application. > > I do see a example in the "Native Constraints" section [2] but that > looks rather complex for my use case. > On the issue tracker I did find ISSUE-35 [3] which resolves in allowing > constraints on the language tag. > > I tried searching the mailing list archive but 'Language' is so > ambiguous that it didn't help me answer this question from the archive. > > Why is the use case mentioned in Issue 35 not there any more, and why is > there no simple way constraint on the language of a literal? > > [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ > [2] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#an-example-native-constraint > [3] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/35 > > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards > Bart van Leeuwen > > ############################################################## > # twitter: @semanticfire > # netage.nl > # http://netage.nl <http://netage.nl/> > # Esdoornstraat 3 > # 3461ER Linschoten > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997 > ############################################################## -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Monday, 14 March 2016 16:18:25 UTC