W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: rdf language tag contraints

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 07:42:27 -0700
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <56E6CDD3.6010006@kcoyle.net>
Bart, thanks. I followed up on the history and it was indeed voted to 
become a requirement, but wasn't added. I will add it to the 
requirements list in the UC&R.

kc

On 3/13/16 9:46 AM, Bart van Leeuwen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Seeing all the productive discussions and positive vibe on the list I
> sat down and read the current Editors draft of SHACL [1]
>
> One of the things that strike me is that I cannot have a simple
> constraint on a language tag.
>
> e.g. I need rdfs:label with '@en' for my application.
>
> I do see a example in the "Native Constraints" section [2] but that
> looks rather complex for my use case.
> On the issue tracker I did find ISSUE-35 [3] which resolves in allowing
> constraints on the language tag.
>
> I tried searching the mailing list archive but 'Language' is so
> ambiguous that it didn't help me answer this question from the archive.
>
> Why is the use case mentioned in Issue 35 not there any more, and why is
> there no simple way constraint on the language of a literal?
>
> [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/
> [2] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#an-example-native-constraint
> [3] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/35
>
> Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
> Bart van Leeuwen
>
> ##############################################################
> # twitter: @semanticfire
> # netage.nl
> # http://netage.nl <http://netage.nl/>
> # Esdoornstraat 3
> # 3461ER Linschoten
> # tel. +31(0)6-53182997
> ##############################################################

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Monday, 14 March 2016 14:42:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:30 UTC