- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:42:24 -0700
- To: Bart van Leeuwen <bart_van_leeuwen@netage.nl>
- Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
I believe we need an issue to make sure this gets discussed. I can create that if you wish, or you can do it. kc On 3/14/16 9:17 AM, Bart van Leeuwen wrote: > Hi Karen, > > Thanks for the follow up, does this mean that a constrained in SHACL > should also be added ? > > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards > Bart van Leeuwen > > ############################################################## > # twitter: @semanticfire > # netage.nl > # http://netage.nl <http://netage.nl/> > # Esdoornstraat 3 > # 3461ER Linschoten > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997 > ############################################################## > > > > From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> > To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > Date: 14-03-2016 15:44 > Subject: Re: rdf language tag contraints > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Bart, thanks. I followed up on the history and it was indeed voted to > become a requirement, but wasn't added. I will add it to the > requirements list in the UC&R. > > kc > > On 3/13/16 9:46 AM, Bart van Leeuwen wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Seeing all the productive discussions and positive vibe on the list I > > sat down and read the current Editors draft of SHACL [1] > > > > One of the things that strike me is that I cannot have a simple > > constraint on a language tag. > > > > e.g. I need rdfs:label with '@en' for my application. > > > > I do see a example in the "Native Constraints" section [2] but that > > looks rather complex for my use case. > > On the issue tracker I did find ISSUE-35 [3] which resolves in allowing > > constraints on the language tag. > > > > I tried searching the mailing list archive but 'Language' is so > > ambiguous that it didn't help me answer this question from the archive. > > > > Why is the use case mentioned in Issue 35 not there any more, and why is > > there no simple way constraint on the language of a literal? > > > > [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/ > > [2] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/#an-example-native-constraint > > [3] https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/35 > > > > Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards > > Bart van Leeuwen > > > > ############################################################## > > # twitter: @semanticfire > > # netage.nl > > # http://netage.nl <http://netage.nl/><http://netage.nl/> > > # Esdoornstraat 3 > > # 3461ER Linschoten > > # tel. +31(0)6-53182997 > > ############################################################## > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net <http://kcoyle.net/> > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600 > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Monday, 14 March 2016 20:42:34 UTC