W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: xsd:anyURI syntax

From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:06:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CAApBiOk3g1X=DQh4_2aGWymWEZtyEJHB60LwccZXb1GXXKvxqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
<pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> The benefit is representational cleanliness.  The literals of type
> xsd:anyURI are being turned into bits of SPARQL code, which are character
> strings that are of the form of IRIs.

Do you think that the use of IRIs in SHACL is conceptually different
than the use of IRIs in RDFS or OWL? If so, how? If SHACL uses IRIs in
a way similar to the way RDFS and OWL do , then we shouldn't use

-- Arthur
Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 21:07:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC