Re: xsd:anyURI syntax from Arthur Ryman on 2015-03-20 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from March 2015)

From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:06:45 -0400
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAApBiOk3g1X=DQh4_2aGWymWEZtyEJHB60LwccZXb1GXXKvxqw@mail.gmail.com>

Peter,

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
<pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The benefit is representational cleanliness.  The literals of type
> xsd:anyURI are being turned into bits of SPARQL code, which are character
> strings that are of the form of IRIs.

Do you think that the use of IRIs in SHACL is conceptually different
than the use of IRIs in RDFS or OWL? If so, how? If SHACL uses IRIs in
a way similar to the way RDFS and OWL do , then we shouldn't use
^^xsd:anyURI.

-- Arthur

Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 21:07:12 UTC