Re: Implementation feasibility (was: Re: Pragmatic Proposal for the Structure of the SHACL Spec) from Arnaud Le Hors on 2015-03-20 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from March 2015)

From: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 13:02:52 -0700
To: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>
Cc: public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFEEF24D9F.8ED31455-ON85257E0E.006D0F3F-88257E0E.006E211E@us.ibm.com>

Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com> wrote on 03/20/2015 10:48:03 
AM:

> Holger, you only mention SPARQL based implementations...this 
> contradicts the assertion that it will be possible to have non-
> sparql based implementations. 
> 

That's not true, it doesn't contradicts the assertion but, it doesn't 
prove its validity either.
I agree that it would be nice to have non-SPARQL based implementations to 
put that question to rest.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Software Group

Received on Friday, 20 March 2015 20:03:28 UTC